Kenya's corruption landscape: Difference between revisions
Daimamkenya (talk | contribs) |
Daimamkenya (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* '''Institutional weakness''': Bodies that are meant to fight against corruptions are highly politically influenced. | * '''Institutional weakness''': Bodies that are meant to fight against corruptions are highly politically influenced. | ||
* '''Normalization''': Corruption is often accepted as the "cost of doing business" or accessing services. | * '''Normalization''': Corruption is often accepted as the "cost of doing business" or accessing services. | ||
* '''Driven top down''': Corruption is often driven from country's top leadership. | |||
== Key corruption cases == | == Key corruption cases == | ||
Revision as of 09:58, 21 July 2025
📢 Kenya's corruption landscape
Kenya’s corruption landscape is deeply entrenched and spans multiple sectors, from government and law enforcement to health, education, infrastructure, and judiciary.
🔍 Key Characteristics
- Systemic and high-level: Corruption goes beyond petty bribery and includes grand theft, public resource looting, and procurement fraud.
- Institutional weakness: Bodies that are meant to fight against corruptions are highly politically influenced.
- Normalization: Corruption is often accepted as the "cost of doing business" or accessing services.
- Driven top down: Corruption is often driven from country's top leadership.
Key corruption cases
⚠️ More Information Required
This section is incomplete. Please help by adding more information with reliable and verifiable sources or details, Note: rumours are against our policy.